
I received a call this morning from our coordinator at NEDC. She informed us that although Ohio couple DID have 9 embryos at one point (3 blastocysts; 6 multi-cell), that another family had already adopted the 6 multi-cell embryos and did not achieve pregnancy. So our Ohio couple has only 3 blastocysts to donate.
Because NEDC requires us to be matched with at least 6 embryos, we could either 1) select a "backup" couple or 2) not proceed with Ohio and start the match process all over again.
This was a major shock and a major blow. We did not see this coming. I made a game time decision to proceed with Ohio and look at "backup" couples. I did this for a few reasons. One, we love our Ohio couple. It is as close to a "perfect" match as we could envision. Second, we feel committed and connected to this couple, and believe that they are relying on us as much as we are on them. Third, because of our "pickiness", we have already so narrowed the pool that it would be hard to start the matching process all over again. Fourth, because many of the couples have fewer than 6 embryos, we'd likely have to have another backup couple anyway.
The added complexity with doing it this way is that we have to get matched with a backup couple that has at least 3 embryos also frozen at day 5 (blastocyst). You can't transfer a day 3 and a day 5 embryo for obvious reasons. The babies need to grow at the same stage together.
So our coordinator sent us 2 profiles. As further evidence of how small our pool is since we 1) want an open adoption, 2) do not want egg/sperm donors, and 3) need at least 3 blastocysts, our coordinator accidentally sent us a profile that we had already rejected. So, we rejected that one again. We did select the other couple as the "backup" couple. The coordinator is sending our profile to them for them to accept/reject us.
This couple is a little younger. They live in Michigan. (We don't know the ages of the Ohio couple, but we suspect mid-30s; embryos likely frozen about 5 years ago). Michigan wife is 28; he is 29. Unlike Ohio, they did not provide a picture. But they have twins -- a boy and a girl born in August 2009. They have 4 embryos, frozen at day 5. We assume they were frozen around the time she acheived pregnancy, so about 18 months ago. So they are relatively "new" snowflake babies.
They are both 5'10 (tall girl!). Both Caucasian, brown hair, brown eyes, medium builds, both of Irish/German descent. They are both college educated. She is an account manager; he is an electrician. Just like Ohio, they have spotless medical histories.
They both love country music (sorry, Tygh! -- but I'm a huge fan). He likes to hunt, fish, boat, camp. His favorite movie is Top Gun. She's a swimmer and loves Kenny Chesney.
All in all, they are a great match. In fact, if we had not already found Ohio, we'd be thrilled to be matched with Michigan. It's just the strange turn of events. And now they have to choose us back. If they don't, who knows where we'll be.
If this works, we will adopt all 7 of the embryos. Ohio's 3 will be thawed first, and see where that gets us. Michigan's would only be thawed if necessary. If pregnancy was not achieved, then we could go back again and try with any of Michigan's that remain.
It is not lost on me that Ohio's 6 (frozen at day 3 or 4) that were previously adopted did not result in a pregnancy. Statistically, blastocysts have a higher success rate than those embryos frozen at day 3 or 4. However, NEDC has assured us that those national stats have not proven accurate at their facility, and they have had equal success rates with embryos frozen at all stages.
This is all even more strange because just this morning I was thinking how much easier it would be to just do domestic adoption again. Yes, the emotional part would probably be the same. Yes, the financial part would probably be the same (after we got the domestic adoption tax credit). But with domestic adoption, I won't have to put myself through the physical rigor that embryo adoption will require. It will be a mini-IVF all over again.
And then my beloved sis-in-law, Kelly, sent me a great email this morning that set the stage for the events that followed. It was a daily devotional titled "The Plans of the Builder/Have Thy Own Way, Lord".
I quote, "Plans change, whether we like it or not. God's intervention in our lives always suits His purposes. He is the homeowner and we obey by adjusting our perspective and and following His blueprint with each situation. Lord, You're the builder, and I'm the worker. I will put my plans for today in second place and allow Your divine purposes to rule. "
Am I reaching too much by again acknowledging that Michigan husband is an electrician -- get it -- God is builder -- he is electrician -- no? ; )


